How do you write a meta-analysis report?

Introduction

  1. Rule 1: Specify the topic and type of the meta-analysis.
  2. Rule 2: Follow available guidelines for different types of meta-analyses.
  3. Rule 3: Establish inclusion criteria and define key variables.
  4. Rule 4: Carry out a systematic search in different databases and extract key data.

What do you report in a meta-analysis?

Results from intention-to-treat analyses should be reported, when possible. The gold standard of data abstraction in a meta-analysis is to include patient level data from the studies combined in the meta-analysis, which usually requires contacting the authors of the original studies.

What is an example of meta-analysis?

For example, a systematic review will focus specifically on the relationship between cervical cancer and long-term use of oral contraceptives, while a narrative review may be about cervical cancer. Meta-analyses are quantitative and more rigorous than both types of reviews.

How long does it take to write a meta-analysis?

How long does it take to conduct a meta analysis? They estimated it should take from 25 to 2,518 hours, with a mean total of 1,139 hours, to conduct a meta-analysis. Their estimate included 588 hours needed for search, retrieval, and creation of a database for the search results.

How many studies do you need for a meta-analysis?

Two studies
Two studies is a sufficient number to perform a meta-analysis, provided that those two studies can be meaningfully pooled and provided their results are sufficiently ‘similar’.

What data is needed for meta-analysis?

The two summary statistics commonly used for meta-analysis of continuous data are the mean difference (MD) and the standardized mean difference (SMD). Other options are available, such as the ratio of means (see Chapter 6, Section 6.5.

What is meta-analysis in research with examples?

Meta-analysis refers to the statistical analysis of the data from independent primary studies focused on the same question, which aims to generate a quantitative estimate of the studied phenomenon, for example, the effectiveness of the intervention (Gopalakrishnan and Ganeshkumar, 2013).

What is the most common reporting standard for systematic reviews?

The major reporting guideline for SRs and meta-analyses is PRISMA (Liberati et al., 2009; Moher et al., 2009), an update to the 1999 Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUOROM) statement (Moher et al., 1999).

How do you write a systematic report?

Steps for writing a systematic review

  1. Formulate a research question. Consider whether a systematic review is needed before starting your project.
  2. Develop research protocol.
  3. Conduct literature search.
  4. Select studies per protocol.
  5. Appraise studies per protocol.
  6. Extract data.
  7. Analyze results.
  8. Interpret results.

Is it hard to do meta-analysis?

In summary, a meta-analysis is an important and valuable tool for summarizing data from multiple studies. However, it is not an easy task and requires careful thought and planning to provide accurate and useful information.

How many studies should be included in a meta-analysis?

How to report the results of a meta-analysis?

Second, the details of how to work out each of the tasks, ordered as stages, in a meta-analysis. Finally, the way to report the results of a meta-analysis in a scientific journal as International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology.

Is there a probability sample in a meta-analysis?

In meta-analysis, however, there is no population and there is no probability sample. The input of the meta-analysis is results of studies. These studies have generated estimates of effect sizes in populations, which are represented in the forest plot by point estimates and their confidence intervals.

What is the difference between a meta-analysis and a systematic review?

A systematic review attempts to gather all available empirical research by using clearly defined, systematic methods to obtain answers to a specific question. A meta-analysis is the statistical process of analyzing and combining results from several similar studies.

What do you mean by meta-analysis in psychology?

Meta-analysis, a methodology for reviewing, integrating and analyzing research results has spread by all the fields of Psychology. But because of its relative researchers have not get a good background on it. In the present theoretical study it is justifying it.